However, the Mass Effect writer did mention that the Indoctrination Theory is still appreciated, and even encourages players to continue writing fan-fiction and creating mods out of this interpretation.

As a result, fans have created an entire theory where no matter what ending the player chooses, it's all a part of the Reapers' grander plan to bring Shepard onto their side.Īccording to Hepler in the interview, this was never the planned intention of the writers when introducing these concepts throughout the original trilogy and surrounding material. Some cherrypicked evidence from around the rest of the series is often picked up as well, to imply that every encounter Shepard has had with different Reapers and the Prothean beacon from the first game has slowly chipped away at their mind.

The theory itself suggests that the reasoning for the strange events at the end of Mass Effect 3 is because Shepard has been indoctrinated by the Reapers by the end of the series. RELATED: BioWare’s Mac Walters Reveals Cut Mass Effect 2 Characters In Hepler's own words about BioWare's intentions when writing the strange events that ended the series, 'We weren't that smart.' Often referred to as the Indoctrination Theory, the idea comes from the strange nature of the original Mass Effect trilogy's ending, with many fans building a new narrative around the surreal events.Īs much as fans enjoy the theory, Mass Effect writer Chris Hepler, who worked specifically on the ending to the series, has once again shot the idea down in an interview with The Gamer. One of the most prolific fan theories for Mass Effect has once again been discredited by BioWare, though the developer does seem to have an appreciation for how fans have developed the interpretation.

Mass effect indoctrination theory 2019